This post is about even more impacts that tourism has had
on the Antarctic environment.
Oil Spills
Oil spills that have occurred in Antarctica have never been of the same magnitude as oil spills that occur from oil pipe leakages such as the
BP oil spill in 2010, where 210 million gallons of crude oil was spilt (The Telegraph, 2011), or
the Little Buffalo oil spill in Canada that occurred in 2011, spilling more
than 800,000 gallons (Yahoo News, 2014). Nevertheless, this does not mean that they don’t have
severe consequences when they occur. If anything, oil spills have an even worse effect because marine life here is much less adaptable and rarer.
When ships travel down to Antarctica they sometimes have
oil spills. The frequency of oil spills is shown in table 1, along with a
summary of their impacts on wildlife.
Source: Aronson et al. (2011) |
From the table, it is clear that oil spills in Antarctica
don’t happen as often as the spills that appear in the news from drilling sites.
Over the past 30 years, Aronson et al. (2011) seem to report just five spills. Interestingly, all of the reported oil spills
have occurred during Antarctica’s summer, confirming that these are impacts
from tourism. Some of these oil spills had no reported effects, demonstrating
that there should be no concern about tourism related oil spills, right?
Not quite! The reason why oil spills in Antarctica are
problematic is that Antarctica does not have infrastructure to deal with oil
spills properly. They don’t have infrastructure to undertake large scale
clean-up operations or clean up oil soaked mammals. Moreover it is difficult to
conduct these operations because of harsh conditions during the winter. Because
of this, the effects of large oil spills can have long run impacts of marine
and terrestrial wildlife.
Bahia Paraiso
The largest oil spill that happened was when the Bahia
Paraiso tourist ship sank, carrying 130 tourists (but luckily they all
evacuated just before the sinking!). The wildlife impacts of this spill were
significant. The South Polar Skua, pictured in figure 1, is a sea bird found prominently
in Antarctica. Antarctica is the bird’s natural habitat. Following the oil
spill in 1989, the mortality rate among this bird species increased sharply and
remained high while the oil was present. This could have been because the birds
feed on krill and fish, both of these were chemically contaminated as a result
of the spill. Young chicks were affected the most, with all of the chicks of a
sample of 53 nests dying during the spill in December (Eppley and Rubega, 1990).
One reason for this was that parents had
been fouled by the diesel oil when they went out looking for food in oil slicks
(where fish and krill are found). Because of this, they spent more time away
from their nests to bathe in freshwater ponds before returning to their nests.
In the meantime this left young chicks unprotected and vulnerable to attack by
other skuas. This affect was widespread and affected the entire population.
Figure 1: South Polar Skua |
Other effects of this oil spill include the transfer of oil from
parents to young or from prey to predator; changes in food availability due to
effects on other populations and toxicity resulting in mortality of Adélie penguins.
So the bottom line is that oil spills are catastrophic to
wildlife in Antarctica and wouldn’t even happen if it wasn’t for all those
tourists and tourist companies making careless mistakes. The new score is negative
impacts: 3, positive/natural impacts: 1.
Again, I understand this post may be slightly depressing, so I would like to end with a few positive points. I came across the ytravel blog which includes a page about Antarctica. Along with a great selection of photos of Antarctica, it also includes a list of reasons to visit Antarctica! It can be accessed by clicking here. Also, my next post will be about how Antarctic treaties and international laws
are trying to protect Antarctica – it’s not all doom and gloom! Until then, I’m
going to leave you with a short video to brighten up this post, illustrating why
we should celebrate the wildlife in Antarctica. Although note - it seems that some
of the clips were videoed by tourists!
Edit: If you would like to know more about tourism in Antarctica, Fiona has a wonderful post about it and also gives her perspective on tourism. Here is a link to her blog.
Your take on tourism is so negative, have you thought about the benefits of tourism such as tourist revenues funding research projects that help protect these animals?
ReplyDelete